Because they're made with flexible resins and binders (synthetic or natural rubber) this type of magnet can be produced as 1) extruded magnetic profiles that are usually coiled or 2) in sheets, resulting in a wide variety of options and properties. For example, extruded flexible magnets are often found on shower door or refrigerator closures. Magnetic sheets, on the other hand, can be cut into all sorts of shapes and sizes, and are what you find holding that souvenir of your summer vacation to your refrigerator door or office filing cabinet.
When flexible magnets are extruded, they pass through a line of powerful cylindrical permanent magnets or a rotating magnetic field. This step allows for the creation of a wide variety of options. For instance, they can be formed to have holding power on both sides, or only on one side.
The most commonly arranged magnetic poles occur in an alternating line format on the same surface plane (NSNSN or SNSNS). An interesting phenomenon occurs when two layers are slipped slightly on top of one another: they both repel and attract as one slides across the surface of the other. One side of the flat surface is more magnetic (has an increase in holding force) than the other. This arrangement of polar direction is called the Halbach Array. It is this alternating polarity that creates modest attraction (fig. 1).
Figure 1: A cross-section of a Halbach array with the alternating poles that create a stronger magnetic field on one side and a weaker one on the other. |
The most common style used in museums is the multi-pole on one side. In museums, flexible magnets are commonly used to attach accession or object numbers in documentation photography, for overall humidification as a substitute for weights, holding wrapper enclosures closed, and mounting of lightweight flat artifacts. Their continuous magnetic field is ideal for overall support; their low pull force, however, does not allow them to support heavy or thick items (Schlefer, 1986; Stenstrom, 1994; Braun, 2001; Keynan et al., 2007; Vilankulu, 2008; Heer et al., 2012; Migdail, 2013).
The pull force of flexible magnets is quite
weak, and they have low magnetic strength when compared to a non-bonded magnet.
Today, the flexible-style magnet is also formed with neodymium (further
described in the following section), creating a much greater pull force.
Thickness of the flexible material is in direct relation to the pull force of
the magnet. Manufacturers specify pull force in pounds per square foot. Pull
force is related to thickness; the thicker the sheet, the stronger the magnet.
A flexible magnet .04 cm (.015 inches) thick has a pull force of roughly 40
pounds per square foot (0.278 PSI) while a flexible magnet .08 cm (.030 inches)
thick has a pull force of roughly 85 pounds per square foot (0.59 PSI). No
other magnet type has such clear-cut specifications; therefore comparing
flexible magnets with others is not easily transferable (table below).
Table: Thickness of the flexible magnet and the pounds per square inch of pull force
Thickness
|
Approximate pounds per sq. ft.
|
Pounds
per square inch (PSI)
|
.012
|
30
|
0.2
|
.015
|
40
|
0.278
|
.020
|
60
|
0.417
|
.030
|
85
|
0.59
|
.060
|
144
|
1
|
Flexible magnets are very susceptible to
demagnetization, especially when in contact with other stronger magnets and
with other similar flexible magnets (fig. 2) (Livingston, 1996). They also appear to
lose their magnetization over time, likely due to proximity to other magnets.
Flexible magnets are less susceptible to demagnetization by their Curie Temperature. When used in a situation where strength is needed, they should be
checked occasionally.
Figure 2: The parallel rows of the flexible magnet visible with a 'magnetic viewing film (left). The same parallel rows disrupted when exposed to a rare-earth magnet (right). |
Flexible, bonded type magnets are conducive
to creating large area pressure type systems. These ferrite-bonded magnets are
weak, but to increase the strength, the polar directions are arranged as in a Halbach
Array during manufacture. It is this
alternating polar direction that provides gentle pressure, evenly dispersed
over an entire surface. Conservators use the standard magnetic orientation of a
magnetic force on one side. Sheets can vary in alignment when placed together
and should be trimmed as a pair. Their strength can be increased somewhat by
using both thicker flexible magnets and a related gauge of metal (Spicer, 2014). A second layer of flexible magnet placed on top does
not add to the pull force of the first layer, due to its particular alternating
polarity.
The addition of pressure created by the pull
force can both introduce and assist in the removal of moisture during
humidification of an artifact. An artifact sandwiched between absorbent
materials is given overall pressure either between two flexible magnets or a
top flexible magnet layer above and a steel plate below. The presence of the
sandwiching method has been noted to slow drying time (Blaser and Peckham, 2006), but the benefit of not having
to lift heavy weights offsets this.
Learn more about magnets and their many uses in the new publications Magnetic Mounting Systems for Museums and Cultural Institutions. Available for purchase at www.spicerart.com/magnetbook.
Learn more about magnets and their many uses in the new publications Magnetic Mounting Systems for Museums and Cultural Institutions. Available for purchase at www.spicerart.com/magnetbook.
As a conservation tool, flexible magnets
have been successfully used for a wide range of applications, including during
humidification of paper and book repair as a substitute for weights (Brooks,
1984; Stenstrom, 1994; and Blaser and Peckham, 2006); an embellishment attachment with two layers of flexible
sheets (Braun 2001); and mounting (Keynan et.
al., 2007; Heer et al., 2012; and
Migdail, 2012).